RT Nov 18
Home ] Up ]

 

We welcome you to this second meeting of the Round Table, a place where Gorean issues may be discussed in a friendly atmosphere of learning, where opinions will be heard with civil respect,  and ofttimes (being Gorean) .. we will agree to disagree.

You will notice the room will be moderated, to allow for an orderly flow of conversation.

An issue will be outlined, giving the facts that are known to the one who presents it.  The panel of Free Elders will comment, question, explore the subject as fully as possible.  At that point, G/guests will be invited to question or comment.
( THIS DISCUSSION DISPLAYS ONLY THE PERTINENT TEXT TO THE DISCUSSION)

PhantomOp: what are the topics for discussion tonight?

 Fanci` 1/ In Gor, there were no unowned girls .. every girl was owned in some capacity or was a runaway.
 
Are online girls who flit around, shopping for a Master (or perhaps, a better deal with a new/reconditioned Master) a problem for online Gor? Does this go into the current problem of disrespect, poorly trained girls,etc>

PhantomOp: Many Goreans seem to treat slaves with callous indifference, or outright rudeness, simply because they are slave. Is this an acceptable means of handling living creatures? One shows more courtesy to a dog or cat than is seen oft times in the interactions between Free and slave.

PhantomOp: the other thing that irks a slave  is having to show respect to Some that do not merit it, but are granted it because their Name is Capped

Fanci`: here is the first Issue .. for Y/your consideration:

Fanci` looks around .. any thoughts?

Korus` raises his hand

Fanci` nods to Korus`

Maitre_Charon raises my hand rises and bows to the FWmy thanks Fanci"

Fanci` smiles and nods, then nods also to Maitre_Charon, indicating He will follow

Korus`: it seems that we on online Gor do not have the possible situation to have all girls owned by slavers  it would make it very difficult for the slaves to become wanted in many homestones  as there are many servers and many channels on each

Fanci` looks to Maitre_Charon .. Your thoughts, please?

Maitre_Charon: It strikes me as completely erroneur to say all girls were owned in the books.  

Grey0: could you elaborate on that, Maitre_Charon??

 Fanci`: Maitre_Charon .. thinking about "girls" .. in the generic sense .. slaves, kajiras, passion slaves, kettle slaves .. were any unowned, except runaways?

Maitre_Charon: however, you asked if it is a problem for online gor

Fanci`: some say it is, Maitre_Charon .. I pose the question for the comments of this group.

Maitre_Charon: Many problems face this community, not least being the way men treat both new and experienced girls, placing them on a pedestal

Maitre_Charon: To my mind, a very ungorean approach, yet one that is creping onwards

Fanci`: that is a concern to some, I know .. but it strays from our question, I think....which is about the plethora of unowned girls on irc Gor.

Maitre_Charon> Let each man look to himself and ask "do i really control these girls, or do they control me"

Fanci`: that is a concern to some, I know .. but it strays from our question, I think.

Maitre_Charon: No, I don't believe it does Fanci`   surely the problem is with the plethor of "uncontrolled" girls

Korus` raises his hand

Grey0: how can all girls online be owned????

Maitre_Charon: if the men let these girls run riot, ignoring the precepts of gor, then they fail us all

Grey0: I do not see how "all" girls online can be owned....

Grey0: they always have the option of hitting the X in the corner

Grey0: even when collared, they could come on in another nick   it is not as if we can actually own them and control then as if it were real life

Grey0: we do NOT have control in actuality

Korus`: some of the worst acting slaves are collared! it seems to my mind that we, as FM are not being selective in ko'laring those that are worthy, many will ko'lar anything on two legs

Grey0: not at all, Maitre Charon

* GothicRaven chuckles in agreement with Korus.

Fanci`: Maitre_Charon?

Korus`: WE as FM and FW are obligated to chose those that are worthy and are slave, not just a cyber kitten

* note .. side remarks not related to the topic are deleted in the interest of clarity

Maitre_Charon: hmm. that depends how you define worthy   but no matter

GothicRaven: My pardons for arriving late, perhaps this topic is enly of slaves...However....doth the ko-lar also ki apply to those whom art Free as well as slaves?

19:47:05 IceMan: it seems to me, MC, that you have change the topic from "are unowned slaves a Problem?" to "The problem with Gorean Channel owners that arent"True" Gorean

Fanci` smiles to the room .. as stated earlier, in order to maintain a flow of conversation, people will be recognized in turn.

Fanci`: I believe GothicRaven had a further thought, Dyre_Wolf

GothicRaven salutes Dyre and nods to the Lady Fanci`.

GothicRaven: Both IceMan and Charon have brought very good points to light. I shalt try to be brief... Even in the books of Norman, very few slaves were ever found 'unko-lared'.    While I can speak only for myself... I must state that a distinction must be carefully maintained and kept between what is Gor and what is Earth. The two mores and moral customs differ greatly, so too do their distinctions of what is a "Master."  There is a certain amount of control, even in this medium.  It begins with ourselves. The first rule of Mastery is Master one's self.

 GothicRaven: While I do not coddle my slaves nor do I greatly enjoy watching it in others...I agree it adds to the overall corruption of this realm of Gor...

SkyeStriker nods in agreement

GothicRaven: I must also respect that Honour, above all things, allows that a man or woman...Has the right to keep what he can. If it is his custom, even as it is in the books. i.e.: Customs of Cos and Ar, each custom differs.  I am of an earlier Gor, where there were no NKZ, NCZ....Yet I cannot condemn a man/or woman, if she is capable, for there were women of power in the scrolls as well, by ruling what he can in the manner that suits him. If I visit a place that does not allow the word 'slut' or such...and this offends me...as a Gorean, it is my self-Mastery that I do not go there again. That is the limit of diplomacy that IRC demands - for truly if we were Gorean, truly Gorean, the IRC technology would not be at our disposal.

IceMan: true

 Dyre_Wolf: very

GothicRaven: If we look at Gor as a whole, it is nothing new. It is based on several old patriarchal societies throughout Earth's history that still exist today.

GothicRaven: It is understanding How this works...fully, even into the recognition of FW as well as the women, Not 'girls' that comprise the whole balance of the overall scope. Many Free I have met would not honour a ko-lar, if we are men and will lead...if we expect honour, we must first claim it, keep it, hold it, and provide it by example. Not by fingerpointing.: Thank you for your patience.

GothicRaven nods to the Lady.

Fanci` looks to GothicRaven with a smile   thank You

Fanci` now looks to Jon of Stormhaven

 Jon: OK, back to the original statement are girls who flit around a problem for online Gor?

Fanci` nods: the question is about unowned girls .. strictly speaking

Jon: yes they are, but really is the ownership of the problem with the girl or with those that enable the behavior..

Dyre_Wolf: I would think so

 Jon: with out giving the girls the opportunity to jump from collar to collar the problem would not exist...

Jon: the Free have to take repsonsibility, the girls are encouraged in the behavior by coddling the girls....sheltering the poor little darlings from those who call them on their behaviors...: the bigger problem is the Free not the girls themselves, as Free we need to look at our own actions first   it breeds the disrespect that you meantion in the statement   for why respect a Free when a girl can run to another Free with a sobstory and basically be told 'there, there'  : there is no cure to the problem while this sort of thing goes on

Fanci` looks to Jon .. then .. you are affirming, that in your opinion, unowned girls are indeed a problem?

Jon: Not all are, but the majority tend to be. Especially those that bounce around, looking for sympathy

Fanci` nods

Fanci`: I think sierra` has a comment now

IceMan: a question, Jon, if I may

Jon: surely IceMan

 IceMan: you mean those that bounce from channel to channel?

Jon: channel to channel, 'protection' of Free to Free...those who play the 'woe is Me' game and love the attention are the serious problem

IceMan agrees...

Jon: for the unowned, tend to have been owned at one time or another and have got someone to cut off a collar they do not like

IceMan: Lady, may I follow up on this

Fanci`: yes, go ahead . then it will be sierra`'s turn

IceMan: thank you...

IceMan: I agree with your comments Jon and indeed it can be a problem if a slave from one Home intrudes into another and corupts the girls there...

IceMan: but we have to deal with the medium as this is where we are...: bans were made for dealing with such problems

Jon: the girls nick gets changed, ISPs change....still the same girl...still the same problem

IceMan: and that will also have the effect of telegraphing to the owner of the girls "Home" that her beehavior is unacceptable  : true... but again we must deal in this medium... how else do you see it controlled... it is certain that not all can be owned

Fanci` smiles and looks now to sierra`

 ra`: ra` thanks her Owner for allowing her to speak   ra`: this slut thinks a very large problem with girls flitting here and there on irc Gor is a lack of culpability for their behavior on their part or the parts of their Owners....the girls are told they are not sluts....are not beasts....are 'treasures' with 'gifts' to give....it's hardly any wonder that these girls placed on D/s pedestals cause problems when addressed by others who truly believe in a Gorean Master/slave relations   as to how it can be controlled? various nets have tried various ways of dealing with it

Fanci` listens to sierra`

ra`: from requiring unowned girls to be in a 'slave pen' channel.....taken out of there to another channel by a FP who vouches for control of the slut  ... to requiring that all girls take a city ko`lar...or perhaps a channel ko`lar could be likened to that on irc servers   : bottom line though is that the girls pretty much know that they will not be taken to task in most places....   if the Free banned girls for behavior more frequently.....or imposed restrictions on them....quit trying to make subbies into slaves....perhaps some of the problems would be rectified   ra` would imagine that most of the bans in channels are for FPs....and not for slaves

Fanci`: those are good points, sierra` ... and perhaps are a basis for a future discussion :)

Fanci`: I would ask that we follow Maitre_Charon's good example here .. and raise hands .. and several will help keep track of who comes next.  I would ask for short posts, please .. so all may comment.

 Fanci`: Maitre_Charon .. a last thought, if You will, then I would like to move onto the next Issue.

 Maitre_Charon: I would like to addres a point GothicRaven made   If we condone the behaviour of others, if we fail to police our own small society, then what does that say about us, as goreans?  If we coondone with a "its another channels business" do we not denigrate the lifestyle for all?

GothicRaven: Charon, I govern myself. Would you wish me to govern you? I greatly doubt this.   I do not intend it as insultive.   Far from it.  For much of what I have heard we agree on many points.

Maitre_Charon: GothicRaven, if this becomes a free for all, then any, even the newgor channels, may claim what they wish. Do YOU want that reflected back on your lifestyle?

20:27:59 * Fanci` looks around .. that, too, is a topic for another time .. "Is there any sanction available except Peer Pressure?" all the while understanding, that Each makes His/Her own rules.

Fanci` looks to the room and announces .. 20 minutes left for the Round Table .. Please .. begin summing up

Fanci`: no names .. no personalities .. please .. this is a debate .. and needs to remain Objective. Or .. we moderate once again.

 GothicRaven: My appreciations however for your patience and your time.  I did not intend to degenerate your forum. Nor do I wish to annoy those whose beliefs differ from mine own. I respect their right to hold them and keep them.

Fanci`: we have a few minutes left .. I'd like to pose an additional issue 

5/ Some channel owners state in their channel topic KZ, FCZ: .. or perhaps > NKZ, NFCZ  

 If it is not stated, is it assumed to be a KZ an CZ?
  : (Or, the reverse?)  If a Kill or Collar occurs in a channel (despite the channel's statement it does not recognize such) .. does it have any validity? If not, would it be clearly invalid 
and show the Doer as an idiot?

_Vitellius_ ponders

Fanci` looks around

Maitre_Charon raises my hand

Fanci` smiles and nods to Maitre_Charon

Maitre_Charon: Firstly, how can a kill have ANY validity on here?

SkyeStriker smiles

Fanci` smiles wryly .. well, they happen with alarming frequency ..  someone thinks they matter.

Maitre_Charon: its on a par with children playing cowboys and indians : "bang, you;re dead"

Kytherea: it can whe it's followed by a nick/kill... or k'line

_Vitellius_: kline only, really
   how does one kill a nick, or collar someone who doesn't wish it on this medium? the point is moot, I think, in reality   and we are claiming we are real, no?

Maitre_Charon: Kytherea, if that is being doone, then a complaint to the server operators is in order

 _Vitellius_ smiles and leans back against the wall

Kytherea nods to Maitre_Charon

Kytherea: true

Jon: To kline is an abuse of IRCops status, it shows the person to be a true player

Maitre_Charon: i don't think its moot at all Vitellius; its bloody impossible

Fanci` is the same true of collaring?

SkyeStriker: It only exists if allow by others.. again is it real or fantisy and are we doing this as R/l or R/p..... open ended query..

Fanci`: is this truly a consensual realm?

Jon: Whenever the assassin tries to kill Me I offer them an airplane ticket to come over and try it real life, none of them have taken Me up on it yet

_Vitellius_: To kline is not an abuse if it is sanctioned on that server for that purpose... it just doesn't happen to be on any public server

Maitre_Charon: its only real if you buy in to the fantasy

Jon: to assassinate someone is a game

SkyeStriker nods

 Jon: I grew up and stopped playing those games when I was about 8     

Fanci`: one might make the case that there is the big X .. up top .. but fact is, some slaves feel paralyzed when a Free is raping, beating, collaring .. whatever. Others (Free and slave) feel obligated to accept Kills. I feel no obligation to buy into roleplaying

Kytherea: that is very true Fanci.. to some.. this is their only oulet.. and they very MUCH feel what is going on.. with their beating heart

Fanci` nods .. they feel its a matter of Honor .. they accept the rules of Gor and believe that is one of them.  : the question is .. is it a rule? and if so, whose rule?

SkyeStriker: Again .. you must buy "in" for this to hold truth to you...

Kytherea: I think people here forget that alot.. that there are beating hearts behind the nicks

Jon: assassinations make Gor the same as Dungeons & Dragons, it makes outsiders laugh at us

Fanci` looks to the clock and notes the Promised Two Hour Limit has been reached. Any who would like to stay and debate further .. are very welcome :)